In speech that ran for 100 minutes there was one moment when Donald Trump drew more applause from Democrats than Republicans. As the president told Congress last week how the US had sent billions of dollars in military aid to Ukraine, his political opponents clapped and unfurled a Ukrainian flag â while his own party sat in stony silence.
It was a telling insight into Republicansâ transformation, in the space of a generation, from a party of cold war hawks to one of âAmerica firstâ isolationists. Where Trump has led, many Republicans have obediently followed, all the way into the embrace of the Russian president, Vladimir Putin â with huge implications for the global democratic order.
âThe reversal is dramatic and the willingness of the Republican party to go along with it continues to be breathtaking,â said Charlie Sykes, a political commentator and author of How the Right Lost Its Mind. âAt least for a while it appeared that Republicans were still going to be supportive of Ukraine. But now that Trump has completely reversed our foreign policy there seems to be very little pushback.â
Last month, Trump set up a peace process that began with the US and Russiaâs top diplomats meeting in Saudi Arabia â with no seat at the table for Ukrainian officials. He branded Ukraineâs president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, a âdictatorâ, a term he has never applied to the authoritarian Putin.
Along with Vice-President JD Vance, he berated Zelenskyy in the Oval Office, a spectacle that prompted the Democratic senator Elissa Slotkin to observe that Ronald Reagan, a Republican president who was an inveterate foe of Soviet aggression, âmust be rolling over in his graveâ. Trump suspended offensive cyber operations against Russia and paused military aid and intelligence sharing with Ukraine until it agreed to a 30-day ceasefire.
The Oval Office shakedown shocked the world but there was strikingly little criticism from Republicans. The secretary of state, Marco Rubio, sank into a couch and said nothing as the shouting raged around him. Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, who had previously been supportive of Zelenskyy, even suggested that the Ukrainian president should resign.
Speaking at a Center for American Progress thinktank event in Washington this week, Patrick Gaspard, a former Obama administration official, said: âWhat you fundamentally believe matters little if youâre acting against those beliefs.
âIt was astonishing to see Republican leaders who on a Monday were praising Zelenskyy and by the Tuesday were removing any reference to him from their websites. Itâs an extraordinary thing to see people who used to be pretty serious on this issue, like Lindsey Graham, suddenly saying the things.â
Meanwhile, other Russia hawks such as the former vice-president Mike Pence, Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger have been sidelined. Republicans who were not shy about countering Trumpâs foreign policy ideas during his first term are now standing by him â in public at least.
Max Boot, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations thinktank and author of Reagan: His Life and Legend, said: âAbsent Trump, I donât think you would see this reorientation of the Republican party. Even with Trump a lot of Republicans, especially on Capitol Hill, are very uneasy about it and donât like what Trump is doing but theyâre afraid to speak out.â

Others suggest that loyalty to or fear of Trump may not be the only explanation. Younger Republicans are questioning the legitimacy of institutions such as Nato and the United Nations and following far-right influencers such as Tucker Carlson, who interviewed Putin in Russia last year and claimed that Moscow was âso much nicer than any city in my countryâ.
Critics say Trump, Carlson and the âMake America great againâ movement see in Russia an idealised version of white Christian nationalism, in contrast to the âwokeâ values of western Europe. Putin has mocked the US embassy for flying a rainbow flag and suggested that transgenderism is âon the verge of a crime against humanityâ.
From this perspective, the struggle is no longer capitalism against communism but rather woke against unwoke. In various speeches Putin has railed against the westâs âobsessive emphasis on raceâ, âmodern cancel cultureâ and âreverse racismâ. He said of the west: âThey invented five or six genders: transformers, trans â you see, I do not even understand what it is.â
All are familiar talking points from the Maga playbook. Indeed, last year, on the rightwing strategist Steven Bannonâs War Room podcast, the Republican congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene said: âLetâs talk about what this really is, Steve: this is a war against Christianity. The Ukrainian government is attacking Christians; the Ukrainian government is executing priests. Russia is not doing that; theyâre not attacking Christianity. As a matter of fact, they seem to be protecting it.â
Bannon has made no secret of his desire to bring down the European Union and âglobalistâ forces. Joel Rubin, a former deputy assistant secretary of state under Barack Obama, draws a comparison with conservative âredâ states and liberal âblueâ states within the US. âLetâs make it real American tangible,â he said. âRussia is a red state and France and England and Nato â theyâre blue states.â
During the cold war, it was hardline anti-communism that was core to the Republican brand. Reagan branded the Soviet Union as the âevil empireâ and stepped up US military spending. But when Mikhail Gorbachev came to power in the Soviet Union in 1985, relations improved.
Reagan and Gorbachev held several summits that led to key arms control agreements. Reaganâs successor, George HW Bush, worked closely with Gorbachev and, later, Boris Yeltsin as the Soviet Union dissolved in 1991, encouraging a transition to democracy and capitalism.

Early in Republican George W Bushâs presidency, he had a relatively positive relationship with Putin, memorably saying he had âlooked into Putinâs soulâ and found him trustworthy. The two cooperated on counter-terrorism following the 9/11 attacks but tensions grew over the Iraq war and US support for Georgia and Ukraine.
By 2008, when Russia invaded Georgia, relations had significantly deteriorated. Obama, a Democrat, initially pursued a âresetâ policy with Russia, aiming to improve relations, but tensions resurfaced after Russia annexed Crimea in 2014 and supported separatists in eastern Ukraine. In response, Obama imposed sanctions on Russia and expelled diplomats.
Russia launched an aggressive effort to interfere in the 2016 presidential election on Trumpâs behalf, according to a later Senate intelligence committee report, which found extensive evidence of contacts between the Trump campaign advisers and Kremlin officials and other Russians.
Trump vehemently denied collusion even as his administration imposed sanctions on Russia. At a joint press conference in Helsinki in 2018, Trump sided with the Russian president over his own intelligence agencies. He has remained unwilling to criticise Putin, even after Russia invaded Ukraine and after the opposition activist Alexei Navalny died in prison.
The Putin-isation of the Republican party should perhaps not be overstated. Older senators such as Mitch McConnell, who is retiring at the next election, Thom Tillis and Roger Wicker remain staunchly supportive of Ukraine.
Henry Olsen, a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center thinktank in Washington, said: âI push back against the idea that Republicans have become entranced with Putin because thereâs not evidence for that. There is evidence that Republicans have become tired of the fight in Ukraine. These things are not the same.â
However, the balance appears to be shifting as the cold war fades into memory. About 41% of Republicans view Russia as either âfriendlyâ or an âallyâ, according to a CBS News/YouGov poll released earlier this month. And just 27% of Republicans agree with the statement that Trump is too close to Moscow, according to a Reuters/Ipsos survey.

Adam Smith, the top Democrat on the House of Representativesâ armed services committee, told the Guardian of the âMake American great againâ movement: âThey have definitely shown a sympathy for Vladimir Putinâs autocratic, âtraditionalâ values, which are very troubling if you care about the problems of bigotry and discrimination. There is growing sympathy and the wing of the Republican party thatâs against that is getting weaker while the other wing is getting stronger.â
He added: âThey believe that theyâre going to promote âtraditional valuesâ and they see Putin as an ideological ally in that. I still think it is a minority within the Republican party but Trumpâs the president. Heâs the leader of that party and theyâre adhering to him. Trump has an enormous amount of sympathy for that worldview and more and more of them are drifting in that direction.â
Bill Galston, a former policy adviser to Bill Clinton, said: âThe Republican party during the cold war was anti-communist and from their standpoint, once communism disappeared, their major motive for opposing Russia did as well.
âThe fact that Russia is a rightwing autocracy doesnât particularly trouble them. To the extent that Putin has refashioned himself as a traditionalist culture warrior, heâs actually making an affirmative appeal to what the Republican party has become.â